| Jones | J.L. | Habitat use of fisher in northcentral Idaho. | 1991 | Masters thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, May 1991 |
Study
I studied habitat use, movements, and diets of radio-collared fishers (Martes pennanti) in northcentral Idaho from 1985-1988 (Abstract, p. iii)
Home Range
Median year-long home-range sizes were 82.6 square kilometers and 40.8 square kilometers for males and females, respectively (range = 28.8119.5 and 6.075.4 square kilometers, respectively); the medians were not statistically different (U=19, P=0.20) (Abstract, p. iii)
Status
The fisher is being used as an ecological indicator species for old-growth communities on the Nez Perce National Forest (USDA 1987). p. 117
Diet
Snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus), voles (Clethrionomys gapperi and Microtus spp.), red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) , and carrion were the most frequent items in the diet. (Abstract, p. iii)
Habitat Use
A broader range of habitats was used for hunting relative to resting activities. During summer, mature or old growth forests occupied 92% and 74% of resting and hunting sites, respectively. Fewer differences between resting and hunting observations were evident in winter. Fishers had a strong affinity for forested riparian habitats during summer and winter; stream courses also appeared to be used for travel. (Abstract, p. iii)
Management Implications
... as Harris (1984) suggested, fisher habitat management must involve the management of a system of mature forests as opposed to the management of individual stands. Management at a landscape scale should incorporate a variety of young to mid-successional stages, to promote a diversity of prey species, in conjunction with late successional stages to provide key resting habitat. In a managed forest, the most likely factor limiting fisher populations would be the availability of mature and old-growth forests to provide optimal resting habitat. (p. 111)
... the fisher appears to be a forest interior species that is dependent not only on patch size, but patch insularity as well. (p. 112)
I believe it is crucial that preferred resting habitat patches be linked together by closed-canopy forest travel corridors. ... These corridors should ideally be located along streamside riparian areas. (p. 112)
Habitat structure required to maintain quality summer and winter fisher habitat:
Variable 75% Quantile
Canopy Cover
Live Trees
1.3-11.4 cm dbh 1475/ha
11.4-21.6 cm dbh 188/ha
21.6-34.3 cm dbh 240/ha
34.3-47.0 cm dbh 106/ha
47.0-62.2 cm dbh 54/ha
>62.2 cm dbh 27/ha
Snags
14.0-24.1 cm dbh 69/ha
24.1-34.3 cm dbh 44/ha
34.3-52.1 cm dbh 20/ha
>52.1 cm dbh 10/ha
Logs
14.0-21.6 cm diameter 40 m3/ha
21.6-34.3 cm diameter 76 m3/ha
34.3-47.0 cm diameter 57 m3/ha
47.0-54.6 cm diameter 0 m3/ha
>54.6 cm diameter 35 m3/ha